Buy The Hunger Games: Mockingjay - Part 1 movie online, buy The Hunger Games: Mockingjay - Part 1 2014 online, buy The Hunger Games: Mockingjay - Part 1 movie download, The Hunger Games: Mockingjay - Part 1 movie buy online, where can i buy the movie The Hunger Games: Mockingjay - Part 1, where can i buy The Hunger Games: Mockingjay - Part 1 movie, where can you buy The Hunger Games: Mockingjay - Part 1 the movie, where to buy The Hunger Games: Mockingjay - Part 1 movie?
The Hunger Games: Mockingjay - Part 1
Year:
2014
Country:
USA
Genre:
Adventure, Sci-Fi
IMDB rating:
6.8
Director:
Francis Lawrence
Woody Harrelson as Haymitch Abernathy
Jennifer Lawrence as Katniss Everdeen
Paula Malcomson as Katniss' Mother
Natalie Dormer as Cressida
Liam Hemsworth as Gale Hawthorne
Sam Claflin as Finnick Odair
Stanley Tucci as Caesar Flickerman
Josh Hutcherson as Peeta Mellark
Toby Jones as Claudius Templesmith
Jena Malone as Johanna Mason
Julianne Moore as President Alma Coin
Philip Seymour Hoffman as Plutarch Heavensbee
Jeffrey Wright as Beetee
Donald Sutherland as President Snow
Elizabeth Banks as Effie Trinket
Storyline: With the Games destroyed, Katniss Everdeen, along with Gale, Finnick and Beetee, end up in the so thought "destroyed" District 13. Under the leadership of President Coin and the advice of her friends, Katniss becomes the "Mockingjay", the symbol of rebellion for the districts of Panem.
Type Resolution File Size Codec Bitrate Format
1080p 1920x802 px 8728 Mb h264 9933 Kbps mkv Download
720p 1280x534 px 8134 Mb h264 9257 Kbps mkv Download
HQ DVD-rip 720x304 px 1404 Mb mpeg4 1666 Kbps avi Download
Reviews
Do yourself a favour
Do not waste your time and money by going to this movie. I haven't watched the previous parts but I knew the story. The whole story could be told in 5 minutes. Nothing new in new series, while the old one didn't have much! I understand the movie was probably targeted for youth but I love to watch cartoons that are for kids. The only nice thing in this movie was the main actor Jennifer Lawrence who looked beautiful but it is not limited to this movie (She looks gorgeous on any movie she played or any media).

I wish there was score ZERO so that I could vote it for this movie.

The worst movie I have ever seen in Movie Theater by far!
2014-12-07
Boring
It's not entertaining like the previous movies, a lot of talking and dialogues in a bunker, they just extended the franchise to make more money and I'm not gonna watch the next one in the theaters, very disappointing!!! Jennifer Lawrence acting was good, in some parts it was a bit, just a little bit exaggerated. But overall I think she did a good job. Some parts were so cheesy and bad that were very amusing. I could hear people laughing at some ridiculous scenes.. The typical laugh you hear when you're watching a BAD movie. I think this is an example of how a studio wants to make more money by extending the franchise. You can tell the budget wasn't big, yes there are some cgi and special effects, but it looked very average. I felt asleep in some parts as well. Bad movie, I don't recommend it whatsoever!!!
2014-12-05
Don't waste your money
If i were you i wouldn't go to the cinema, I've already wasted my money don't waste yours too. The division in two parts is merely commercial, they haven't earned enough money with the first and the second movie (sarcasm). In principle the division could have been a good thing for the scenography, the narration and so on, but they have cut the story in the wrong point. In the end we have a slow and boring movie. In the most of the film there wasn't any action, just one arrow is shot by Katniss through all the movie! And in the majority of the film there was no tension. I didn't like the scenography, i.e. what they have chosen to play. The book is so much better. So, my advise is: Buy the book and read it, Don't Watch this crappy movie!
2014-11-23
Predictable, slow, boring, poor acting, etc
The first movie was fresh and entertaining. I've been dragged by my partner to watch the second one which I actually enjoyed until the end when I realized it was not finished yet. The Hunger Games: Mockingjay Part 1 is simply a jock. I've never been so much bored from a movie and at some point I really considered leaving the theater. The pace is slow, the acting terribly poor and every single scene predictable. Jennifer Lawrence's character has been stretched to the maximum. All she does is crying and pretending all movie long.I will not watch the part 2 in theater nor on TV as we all already know what will happen. This movie is perfect if you want to feel frustrated, disappointed and tricked.
2014-12-30
Sprint to a dull crawl
Quickie Review:

After the events of 75th Hunger Games, Katniss (Jennifer Lawrence) is rescued and brought to District 13 where the rebellion is brewing. Now she must become the face of the rebellion as both sides use propaganda against each other. Meanwhile, Katniss is overwhelmed by balancing her responsibility to the people of Panem with her desire to save Peeta (Josh Hutcherson). Mockingjay Part 1 is strong when it comes to the acting talent involved and showing the behinds the scenes propaganda of war. However, the decision to split the story into two parts has really hurt this movie by making it feel incomplete and filled with overstretched melodrama. While it is not a complete failure, it may be better to hold off watching this movie till Part 2 is released.

Full Review:

I never read the books but I enjoyed the last two movies in the franchise, especially Catching Fire. While I can't say I was aching to go see Mockingjay Part 1, I was interested to know how the story progressed after the cliff-hanger of the last movie. I was concerned that splitting the story into two parts may have been a detrimental choice, unfortunately my concerns were legitimate.

I know I'm coming off really negative but there are definitely some gems in the movie. Jennifer Lawrence as Katniss and Donald Sutherland as President Snow, were the best part of the movie. Watching them clash and play strategic moves against each other was intriguing. The rest of the cast do a good job in showing how they have been affected and changed by this war. This is the first time we see the world outside of the actual Hunger Games and District 12, which helped enrich this movie's universe. Uniquely we get see how propaganda plays an important role in the war. I can't remember the last war movie that delved into that aspect. On top of that, these propaganda pieces were very moving thanks to the rage fueled words of Katniss and the fear mongering of Snow.

A lot of the problems for this movie stem from the fact we are spending 2hrs on half a story. This led to us having an entire movie where Katniss keeps crying and moping about either Peeta or the people of District 12 being dead. The feeling that the movie is overstretched is only compounded by how several scenes are just a rehash of a previous scene, for example the recording of a propaganda (3 times) and multiple scenes per character sulking about the people suffering. Look I'm not heartless, I understand those are devastating things to happen to a person, but we want to see the story move forward. I can honestly say that apart from Katniss becoming the face of the rebellion, there is no significant plot development since Catching Fire. There is all this slow build up but that's all it is, a build up to an end that is unsatisfying. Essentially this is a 2hr preview ad for Mockingjay Part 2, and quite frankly I felt mad about this when I left the cinema, and that doesn't happen often.

The pathetic cash-grab moves by studios to split the movie into two parts is the root of all the problems for Mockingjay Part 1. To fill the run time the movie is stuffed full with melodrama without much weight to make you care for long. All the momentum that the previous two movies had built has now come to a dull crawl. I'd recommend skipping this movie till Part 2 is released and hopefully enjoy a more complete story.

Check out more on my movie review blog The Stub Collector: http://thestubcollector.wordpress.com/
2014-11-23
totally disappointed and frustrated
There is nothing to tell about this move. it is a test to your patience. I did watch hunger games films. This was a worst movie i saw recently. it is just 2 hour narration of same piece of information again and again, again and again. movie won't go further and do not except a single action sequence even though in the movie, there is war going on as part of story. from begin to end, all they did is just talking in different places ( a bunker or ruined building or near a lake).

only scenes I liked were fights carried by rebels against capital.if you are going to this film do't dare to have any expectation. i hope that they will make part 2 in much better way.
2014-11-24
Meh
The direction in this film is pretty solid, and the visuals are impressive.

Unfortunately it falls down in every other area. It's slow, boring, predictable and unbelievable. The reactions to Peeta are severely unconvincing. Seriously? In his situation that's precisely what would happen and everyone would understand that, but there has to be tension because of Teenage Drama (TM).

Yawn. It started off with a sub Battle Royale conflict and went downhill from there. The books aren't much better either, although the final ending is mildly amusing.

Go watch Maze Runner instead - it's a decent film, and an improvement over the books.
2014-11-22
Worst in the series?
I've never been a fan of 'The Hunger Games' films. Having read the book trilogy a few years ago, the idea of having a film series based around the novels seemed like a good idea... Unfortunately, none of these films have lived up to the hype surrounding them. I walked into the cinema expecting something far better than the previous films, and by the end of the movie I was more disappointed than I have been with any other installment in the series.

As with the previous films, what felt like an hour of time was completely wasted at the start. The time is taken up by boring dialogue and meaningless, confusing conversations between characters that feel like they were written simply to extend the running time of the film and serve little to no purpose at all. The second half of the film begins speeding up, but even then the majority of the time given has been wasted on those 'does anyone really care' scenes from the previous films. Then there's the acting. In both 'The Hunger Games' and 'Catching Fire', Jennifer Lawrence's acting has been one of the few things in the movies that was actually done properly, when compared to the poor acting of the rest of the cast. In 'Mockingjay' however, Lawrence's performance is extremely overdone... Luckily some of the supporting cast manages to do a fairly good. Lastly is the fact that Mockingjay is being split into two films. It's common for a single book to be made into multiple movies (I mean, just look at The Hobbit), but the issue with Mockingjay is that the entire novel could have been adapted into a single film. As I said earlier, the amount of time wasted in this film is insane... The entire Mockingjay novel could have easily been into a 2 hour film if those 2 hours were actually spent properly.

Personally, I think this movie doesn't deserve the 7/10 rating it currently holds here. Unless your a 13 year old girl and/or really don't care about the pacing and acting in this film.... I wouldn't recommend it.
2014-11-24
Didn't we just see this as Battle Royale II: Requiem?!?!?
The easiest thing to do with The Hunger Games: Mockingjay - Part 1, a "don't call it a remake" of Kenta Fukasaku's 2003 pioneering dystopian film Battle Royale II, is to simply dismiss it.

Know that this isn't a particularly good film, let alone a capable rehash. It feels burdened by stilted direction and gormless editing, and in some ways defiles the original work by making overt what was far more subtle in the original.

The Hunger Games: Mockingjay - Part 1 is a film that fails twice - I believe it will fail to impress audiences unfamiliar with the original film, nor will it provide anything particularly revelatory to an audience familiar with the Japanese version.

It's no wonder that the translation to a Western audience is a challenging one - even the terminology of the film's title isn't really part of the American idiom. Once you've accepted that the film is kind of a mess, it's still quite interesting to break down just what Collins has done to transplant the story. This is part of the "reimagining" rather than the remake, and I credit the work for at least attempting something new, recognizing full well that a shot-for-shot redux would be in some ways even more disastrous.

Alas, things go wrong pretty spectacularly on many fronts. There's still all the same elements, but again this is a mere echo to the original, perhaps shocking to an uninitiated audience, but more likely to simply be one among many ways that the film jabs at what has come before. It's both trying to be its own thing while echoing the past, and while this is a laudable task, here it seems futile. We lose the incessant urgency of the original film in exchange for a baddie that feels like a Prime Minister Yuki wanna-be (or, worse, the bad guy from some later-numbered Die Hard movie).

Still, it's in the definitive scenes from the original that Lawrence's film really shows its stripes, and it feels like some amateur karaoke version of the original. Instead of a taut, visceral nut-punch of a scene, it all feels tacked on, like some hurdle that needs to be overcome in order for the film to satisfy previous fans. Not only is nothing new done in these scenes, it in some ways shines a pall on the original, making on some level the well regarded scene in Fukasaku's film seem lessened somehow. Yes, it's that bad, a swooping camera that makes the action feel tedious rather than energetic, repetitive rather than illuminating of both character and actor.

I wanted to love this film. I went in with appropriate levels of cautious expectation. I believe there's a space for outright plagiarism like this, and don't abide the fact that some films, particularly genre films of this type, are sacrosanct and somehow should be free from being remade for an English-speaking audience. When done well, as Lawrence's mentor Martin Scorsese did with The Departed, you can in fact pay homage excellent original, finding ways of expanding the narrative with grace and sophistication.

Alas, Lawrence's folly is that all of his visual and choreographic contributions seem to be lesser than the original. The script twists itself into contortions to make things even more monotonous for those familiar with the original, but it does so at the cost of some of the more subtle elements of character and morality that Fukasaku's film embodied.

The Hunger Games: Mockingjay - Part 1 is a film without an audience, either neophyte or those familiar with the previous work, yet I still encourage you to see it. It's in some ways a cautionary tale about this kind of filmmaking. It's a film that fosters discussion about the nature of ripoffs more so than it does about story or character. Its plot is far more interesting for how the writers have crafted different ways of trying to do similar things, and some may find fodder in dissecting the differences between the passions and perversities of both American and Japanese culture.

What 2014's The Hunger Games: Mockingjay - Part 1 is not is a standalone work. It's a film that exists solely as a distorted reflection upon what the credits almost sardonically fail to credit, ignoring both the manga source material and the authorial attribution of Japanese writer Koushun Takami as well.

It's a brave path to take, and would be key to the film's success if it earned any, but instead we're left with very much a failed attempt by a filmmaker that seems very much like he's entirely out of his element with this work.
2015-02-10
WORST movie in a few years
1. The pace is very slow. Literally nothing happen in the first 1.5 hour.

2. MockingJay is claimed to be "unique and irreplaceable". But she has absolutely no ability or leadership skills or braveness or what so ever. Basically a useless character in the movie.

3. No thrilling fighting except for a large group of people crying, shouting, or running for no reason.

4. MockingJay is supposed for fight for the whole district. But her action is solely based on her selfish emotion for her boyfriend.

5. Graphics and sound are mediocre.

Absolutely the worst movie I have seen in the past few years.
2015-02-07
Georgina Fisher (Houston) Maybe you are looking Francis Lawrence for where can i buy the movie The Hunger Games: Mockingjay - Part 1? Here you can download it legally. Anne Tran (Indianapolis) It is very likely that you want to find a website Adventure, Sci-Fi where can i buy The Hunger Games: Mockingjay - Part 1 movie 2014? You are moving in the right direction and are in the right place! Donald Conrad (Brooklyn) Favorite actors: Woody Harrelson, Jennifer Lawrence, Paula Malcomson, Natalie Dormer, Liam Hemsworth , Sam Claflin, Stanley Tucci, Josh Hutcherson, Toby Jones, Jena Malone, Julianne Moore, Philip Seymour Hoffman, Mahershalalhashbaz Ali, Jeffrey Wright, Donald Sutherland, Elizabeth Banks, Willow Shields in search of an answer to the question where can you buy The Hunger Games: Mockingjay - Part 1 the movie USA? You have found this Adventure, Sci-Fi genre on this page. Darren Conley (Dallas) Among the huge collection of films in 2014 in the formats mkv, mp4, avi, mov, and flv it was difficult to find where to buy The Hunger Games: Mockingjay - Part 1 movie? But my favorite film director Francis Lawrence shot this film in the USA in 2014.
×