Buy Amelia 2.0 movie online, buy Amelia 2.0 2017 online, buy Amelia 2.0 movie download, Amelia 2.0 movie buy online, where can i buy the movie Amelia 2.0, where can i buy Amelia 2.0 movie, where can you buy Amelia 2.0 the movie, where to buy Amelia 2.0 movie?
Buy Amelia 2.0 2017 Online (mkv, avi, flv, mp4) DVDRip
Year:
2017
Country:
USA
Genre:
Drama, Sci-Fi, Romance
IMDB rating:
6.7
Director:
Adam Orton
Ed Begley Jr. as Paul Wesley
Malorie Mackey as Sinndy
Ben Whitehair as Carter Summerland
Angela Billman as Amelia Summerland
Jesse Henecke as Grant Barker
Rachelle Carson as Sara Conrad
John Livingston as Sam Patterson
Kate Vernon as Dr. Ellen Beckett
Debra Wilson as Adah Allen
Chris Ellis as Senator Thaddeus
Eddie Jemison as Max Parker
Storyline: When his wife Amelia suffers an aneurysm that leaves her bedridden and slowly dying, police officer Carter Summerland searches for a way to revive her. He's approached by Wesley Enterprises about allowing Amelia to be the test subject for an experimental program that will place her mind in a new, artificial body - and out of desperation, Carter agrees. But is the result really Amelia Summerland? Or is it something else entirely? Set in the very near future, The Summerland Project uses current, existing technology as a launchpad for a story about where the line truly is between life and death, and to ask the question: What is is that makes us human?. It explores the motivations behind the team that creates Amelia, from genius but standoffish Dr. Ellen Beckett to the kind yet arrogant industrialist Paul Wesley, who funds the work. It explores the fallout in the scientific, legal and religious community, with opposition to the project spearheaded by the passionate Senator Williams. But ...
Type Resolution File Size Codec Bitrate Format
1080p 1912x1072 px 3608 Mb h264 5641 Kbps mkv Download
HQ DVD-rip 720x400 px 1078 Mb mpeg4 1672 Kbps avi Download
Reviews
Eye Opener
This movie has provoked a hidden curiosity, maybe more so fear in me of how technology can/will dangerously minimize our human abilities. I think it's an important movie. It produces a motivation for education on what is to come for us in the not so distant future. Making the choice to deny our natural human emotions whether they are pain or joy, will have a negative consequence on all of humanity,makes me want to teach my grandchildren to garden, and build things so they don't forget what that is.. K.S.
2017-08-17
Morality play/tragedy in Science Fiction format.
Though set in a science fiction format, this movie centers on a deeply loving newlywed couple overcome by tragedy and how the husband deals with this issue. In his grief, he agrees to the plans of a corporate giant in the remote hope of "curing" his wife's terminal condition.

Technically, the film is state of the art with some obvious exceptions. Note the aerial view of the corporate campus looking quite cartoonish, like an architectural drawing or SimCity home computer creation.

The flow of action was quite uneven, spending long moments in philosophical discussions while skimming over the scientific elements of the story (the "how it was done" aspects). The ending was quite disturbing to me and didn't seem possible, given modern corporate security methods. It appeared that the film was running out of time (or money) and ended quite abruptly in poetry and bucolic bliss.
2017-08-11
A 'bare bones' Sci-Fi endeavor.
This one left me with mixed feelings. I had some misgivings with the way it was portrayed but other things just niggled me to the extent I was unable to enjoy the story. The corporation, the scientists, technical aspects are not done well. For such a significant project they seemed to be running around doing everything on the fly. No plans, expectations, procedures and steps to determine progress; no path to map events with actions or considerations... nothing. Even more perplexing was the fact that the project was in relative infancy. The android was not even a working prototype. Half the issues it experienced (glitches meltdowns etc) were new to the technical team, and the notion they would be able to solve them in such a haphazard manner is ridiculous.

Most films I've seen with this or similar themes tackle the above issues far more competently than this on does. I think a little technical advice from a consultant would have gone a long way here, but in truth I don't think that was ever really the main aim of the movie, which leads me to my second point.

The film doesn't seem certain just what story it wants to tell. It seems to be trying tackle the moral, ethical, and sociopolitical issues associated with creating artificial life, or at least transposing human life onto an artificial construct, but also dealing with the scientific and technological challenges in building a synthetic host for humans and transferring consciousness successfully to that host. As I said, it doesn't do either well, but that may well be because of a lack of focus. At any rate the story definitely suffers, and there isn't really anything compelling from either perspective to reel you in and anchor you to the story.

The script, screenplay, and story in its current form just don't work and the result is a rather boring attempt to create a story around what would otherwise be a very interesting subject. Also the fact that nothing of significance ever really happens to move the story forward doesn't help either. Notions on existentialism aren't tackled credibly, and actually most aspects of the film seem premature. This another Sci-Fi tale that should have had a serious re-write before production and as it stands has very little to offer.

The quality of production is reasonable. The special effects relative to the plot have been done competently enough but this isn't an expensive production so it really needed to deliver on some significant areas, which of course it doesn't. Everything else is OK, nothing to write home about, but adequate. I doubt this this will be remembered either well or badly. Its just another passing film, realised and forgotten.

I don't recommend it, for the most part its just a boring rendition on the theme of extended life through technology.
2017-08-17
A film about trans humanism. Downloading consciousness into an android. Creates an ethical dilemma as this technology continues to evolve.
This a very low budget independent film that explores the subject of downloading a conscious mind and then building an android that may look like the actual human. It is thought provoking on many different levels - what it means to be human, where is someone's soul and what life may look like in the future with ageless bodies and minds that continue to evolve.
2017-08-10
What about the soul?...
When I found "Amelia 2.0" I didn't even read the synopsis for the movie, nor did I know anything about the movie, I just picked it up and decided to give it a go.

First of all, I must say that writer Rob Merritt definitely came up with a very interesting and entertaining story here. And better yet, it is a story which raises a lot of questions in the audience as you view it, in terms of your own views on the issues being dealt with throughout the movie. And for a movie to be able to raise that kind of questions, that is something that I find rather impressive.

The special effects and CGI effects in "Amelia 2.0" were quite good and really worked in favor of the movie. And for a Sci-Fi movie of this nature then having special effects is definitely a plus. If the movie had less impressive CGI, then the movie would have been much less enjoyable or convincing.

"Amelie 2.0" has an ensemble of good acting talents, which were for the most part new faces to me. And I do enjoy watching new actors and actresses on the screen, as there are no associations to other previous characters linked to the performers. So that was a definite plus in my book. The actors and actresses in the movie were doing good jobs with their given roles and characters, and that was working well in favor of the movie.

Director Adam Orton did a great job in bringing writer Rob Merritt's story to life on the screen.

The characters in the movie are quite well-rounded and they have very distinct personalities and traits. And the dialogue throughout the course of the movie was well written and delivered by the various actors and actresses.

The movie makes use of way too many short shots of random and pointless images that serves absolutely no purpose to the movie, aside from being fillers. That was particularly true for the first 10-15 minutes of the movie.

I really enjoyed how this movie raises some issues and questions about humanity, the ability to replace the body in parts or as a whole, and how the soul fits into all of this if you take a religious stand on it. But also how traditional and inbred thinking stands in the way of technological advancement and the fear of embracing new and innovating things that break up with how things traditionally are and have been for a long, long time.

I have a feeling that this movie might be very underrated and slip under most people's radar. However, I can most strongly recommend that you take the time to sit down to watch "Amelia 2.0" if you have the chance.

The ending of the movie was not really one that did the movie or the storyline much justice, and it felt just like it was a very, very wrong way to end the movie.
2017-08-18
Frankenstein has a new face
This is a 21st century retelling of the Frankenstein story. The difference is that the body is an android and they have placed the memory of a real human in the system. Amelia had a functional brain but had a condition which paralyzed her. There is an ethic debate over the issue which was done from strictly a theological view point. The ending was messed up and the film slow at times.Mildly entertaining science fiction which concentrated too much on a poorly scripted debate that we had in the 19th century.

Guide: no swearing, sex, or nudity.
2017-08-09
A good example of a great idea poorly developed
Another approach for the Theseus's paradox, what makes us "us"? Is it our bodies? Our conscience? Our memories? If we maintain our conscience, but change the body, are we the same? If our memories are implemented in another being, do we "die" and, at the same time, reborn in another body? The film uses this complex discussion and distillate it - a lot - for the viewer, it is so watered down that we can't even consider it with a philosophical concept anymore.

(here I start nitpicking, if you don't like that skip the next paragraph)

Maybe it happened like this for plot reasons, but some things didn't make sense, for instance: when Amelia (android) had her first contact with Amelia's (the deceased wife) memories, everything was fine until her system conflicts with the fact that the deceased wife is dead. The android believes that she is still that Amelia, but how come can she be that Amelia if she shouldn't be awake? So her system enters in a breakdown and so does she. For me, understandable, the android would have access to an early memory that is triggered by two events: in school when a little girl approaches her and at home when she faints; fast forward to the android getting better acquainted with her body, and here starts the "plot-holes", Amelia known she is married, but doesn't know who the person she is married with, which doesn't make sense, a huge event such as a wedding isn't something that she should understand and even request for "my wedding ring". She must know what a wedding and a wedding ring represent, thus knowing that she has to be married with someone, being married implies that she has spent sometime with the other person - cue the memory she has of someone she can't remember her face, but makes her happy. It is highly unlikely that she only had one memory of that person, she must have done several other connections to connect someone as her husband, otherwise she wouldn't be able to recognise herself as a married woman, nor the value of her wedding ring.

Story wise I believe the script seemed rush, they tried to use a lot of different characters and it felt over-saturated, for instance the political part was rushed in some moments and wasn't used in its full potential. The characters development, considering those that have, is limited, some are out of nowhere as Max in love, others are expected as Paul being a greedy (companies and money vs. Science and patience). Some of the acting is distasteful, even though I didn't have my hopes high for some actors and actresses.

It is a 90 minutes film that will pass and you will feel like nothing changed in your life, as I said before the philosophical idea that could have been a mark of the film on the viewer was watered down, thus a plain film that will be forgettable for most.
2017-08-13
Georgina Fisher (Houston) Maybe you are looking Adam Orton for where can i buy the movie Amelia 2.0? Here you can download it legally. Anne Tran (Indianapolis) It is very likely that you want to find a website Drama, Sci-Fi, Romance where can i buy Amelia 2.0 movie 2017? You are moving in the right direction and are in the right place! Donald Conrad (Brooklyn) Favorite actors: Ed Begley Jr., Malorie Mackey, Ben Whitehair, Rob Merritt, Angela Billman, Jesse Henecke, Kamar De Los Reyes, Rachelle Carson, John Livingston, Kate Vernon , Malcolm Danare, Debra Wilson , Chris Ellis, Eddie Jemison, Alexandra Vino in search of an answer to the question where can you buy Amelia 2.0 the movie USA? You have found this Drama, Sci-Fi, Romance genre on this page. Darren Conley (Dallas) Among the huge collection of films in 2017 in the formats mkv, mp4, avi, mov, and flv it was difficult to find where to buy Amelia 2.0 movie? But my favorite film director Adam Orton shot this film in the USA in 2017.
×